Anonymous
Yay, first time I post on a weekday this month.
Anyone registered with Friendster yet? I did 2 weeks ago but thought that it was quite a dumb idea, but last sunday I realised at least most of the people I know have signed up, so yay can find many people I know there.
Suddenly, the tension, the drift, the animosity between Comic-Reader has vanished. I guess I was quite stuck up at that point and irritated to the maximum with everything, such that I was overly emotional and less rational. The same thinking logically I have failed to placate that week, and I was being too picky and bias against everything and everyone. OK, everything's over! But..... I won't tolerate 100% Straberry, it's still stupid. *smirks*
If women are featured on the covers of most Men magazines, why aren't men featured on most women magazines (generally) ?
The front cover of FHM featured features women in the most skimpy outfits, posed in the most sensuous sympathetically stimulating positions whereas in 'Women's Weekly', 'CLEO' or the usual female newstand magazines, instead of featuring a half-naked hunk with a Greek-God bronzed body, the front cover is still a woman. However, the woman (usually) is dressed less skimpy and usually only shows the face (with a flawless complexion) and not the whole body.
Direct reasons would include the varying desires of the different sex, and the different concerns/interests of men and women. Somehow I have a foreboding that the comments box would be bombarded with the lascivious mores attributed to men. *snickers*
Note: I'm referring to magazines pertaining to general lifestyles, and not magazines that cater to a specific area (eg Bodybuilding etc)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home